<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Friday, October 19, 2007

 
"NAY" ON MUKASEY Waterboarding is torture. Period.

America can't afford another Attorney General who isn't willing to say so.

[SEN. SHELDON] WHITEHOUSE [D-RI]: Is waterboarding constitutional?

MUKASEY: I don't know what is involved in the technique. If waterboarding is torture, torture is not constitutional.

WHITEHOUSE: "If waterboarding is constitutional" is a massive hedge.

MUKASEY: No, I said, "If it's torture." I'm sorry. I said, "If it's torture."

WHITEHOUSE: "If it's torture." That's a massive hedge. I mean, it either is or it isn't. Do you have an opinion on whether waterboarding, which is the practice of putting somebody in a reclining position, strapping them down, putting cloth over their faces, and pouring water over the cloth to simulate the feeling of drowning. Is that constitutional?

MUKASEY: If it amounts to torture, it is not constitutional.

WHITEHOUSE: I'm very disappointed in that answer--I think it is purely semantic.

MUKASEY: I’m sorry.


CONTRAPOSITIVE is edited by Dan Aibel. Dan's a playwright. He lives in New York City.