<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Wednesday, January 10, 2007

 
TO SUM UP In case you've tuned out lately, here's a succinct summary of the conventional critique of the Bush escalation plan:
The premise of the speech, and of the strategy, is that there is a national democratic government in Baghdad, defending itself against Jihadist attacks.

The task, in the president's mind, is therefore to send more troops to defend such a government. But the reality facing us each day is a starkly different one from the scenario assumed by the president.

The government of which Bush speaks, to put it bluntly, does not exist. The reality illumined by the lynching of Saddam is that the Maliki government is a front for Shiite factions and dependent for its future on Shiite death squads. U.S. support for the government is not, therefore, a defense of democracy in a unified country, whatever our intentions. It is putting the lives of American soldiers in defense of the Shiite side in an increasingly brutal civil war.
That the President's speech failed to reference this critique is not surprising. But it is telling.


CONTRAPOSITIVE is edited by Dan Aibel. Dan's a playwright. He lives in New York City.