<$BlogRSDUrl$>

Saturday, May 28, 2005

 
KRUGMAN FIGHTS BACK From Sunday's New York Times:
In Daniel Okrent's parting shot as public editor of The New York Times, he levied a harsh charge against me: he said that I have "a disturbing habit of shaping, slicing and selectively citing numbers in a fashion that pleases his acolytes but leaves him open to substantive assaults."

He offered no examples of my "disturbing habit," and maybe I should stop there: surely it's inappropriate for the public editor to attack the ethics of one of the paper's writers without providing any supporting evidence. He responded to my request for examples with criticisms of specific columns. Those criticisms were simply wrong: in each of those columns I played entirely fair with my readers, using the standard data in the standard way.

That should be the end of the story.

I want to go back to doing what I have been doing all along: using economic data to inform my readers.

PAUL KRUGMAN
Princeton, N.J., May 24, 2005
Good for him. (Here's the link.)

Okrent and Krugman will trade more words about Okrent's smear sometime next week here.



CONTRAPOSITIVE is edited by Dan Aibel. Dan's a playwright. He lives in New York City.